Recent Discussions
Player editor
Can we please have the option to edit the appearance computer generated players in offline dynasty. it really kills immersion having all white running backs and black punters galore and don’t get me started on the names which are beyond ridiculous. if total editing is somehow in violation legally, how about giving us a random generator for appearance and names. everything else I’ve heard about cfb 26 sound awesome,Co op Online dynasty- play same team with friends
Can we please make a co op feature for online dynasty in ncaa 26? Making it able to play on the same team as friends online. This was such a cool feature on the early ncaa games. I can’t imagine this being a tough add to the game!! We all live in different states and want to be able to run a dynasty together. Even if that means one guy running the dynasty, and being able to invite the others into the switch sides screen. Please make this possible!! I’ve seen so many requests for this since last years game came out. EA_KentExporting/Importing Draft Classes
Old school question here. Back in NCAA 15, we could export a draft class and import it to Madden. With College Football 25, it was a disappointment for franchise guys to see this feature was not included. Of course that would mean being able to import draft classes into Madden. Do you not think it would be a selling point when bundling Madden and College Football with these features in each? I miss being able to build a college program and then being able to draft my guys on my Madden team. please bring it back!RTG High School Mode
Am I the only one who is vastly disappointed in the decision to make RTG high school mode a collection of moments that you play instead of playing out a full season or AT LEAST playing through the playoffs? In my personal opinion, playing through your full senior season was one of the best parts of this game mode. It was a lot of fun to pave your own path and slowly acquire scholarship offers from better teams throughout the course of a season. I get that some people may not want to play a full 10-12 game season plus the playoffs, but I really liked how NCAA '13 would let you set the schedule duration so you could choose how many games you get to play out. I'm optimistic that it won't be as bad as the initial report sounded, but I think that the vast majority of OG players were looking forward to playing full games and extra customization.2025 was 99% towards a real coach mode. Can it please be 100% for 26?
There was already a slow-sim mode that showed every play from broadcast view with full AI control of all players. Just let us do game management and play-calling from here like in 2014. It makes recruiting so much more dynamic when my own skill is taken out of consideration. If I want my own skill tested, than RTG is already there and fantastic. The current "coach mode" is functionally useless as is, and is more of a helper mode that still requires you to manually control the QB.Divisions =/= Protected Rivalries, and never have
This was one of the most infuriating things about NCAA25. Generally really enjoyed the game. On the field it is a hell of a technical achievement. But off the field the relative inflexibility of the custom conferences system in this game compared to past editions or even reality takes me out of it. For anyone who does not know, "protected rivalries" is a system used by conferences (and NCAA Football 12, 13, and 14) to ensure a matchup is played annually when it otherwise normally would not be. In the previous games, it existed where you had a conference of 12, 14, or 16 teams and you picked each team's permanent cross-over opponent. For example, back in the days of the SEC East and SEC West, Alabama would be Tennessee's permanent cross-over opponent, thus protecting that rivalry from the randomness of the schedule. Same thing for Auburn and Georgia, or NC State and North Carolina in the ACC. It was labeled as "protected rivalries" in the custom conferences screen. Importantly, you got to pick which rivalries got protected and which ones did not. This is critical as conferences move away from divisions. This system existed because divisions were not an adequate structure for preserving all of the annual games each team had. Divisions require everyone to play each other in the same division; they are a small round-robin unit, which does admittedly preserve some games on an annual basis. However, it comes at a much higher cost on the team's schedule, because instead of the rivalry taking up one game on the schedule, putting them in the same division means they share all the same opponents. This is not a good system where teams have an all-important rivalry but otherwise do not share any other rivalries. In NCAA25, if you were to revert the SEC back to the 12-team setup that existed prior to 2011, Alabama-Tennessee and Auburn-Georgia would not be protected. They might still play each other, but you are playing the odds; with 8 conference games, and 5 conference games needing to go to playing divisional opponents, that leaves 3 divisional cross-over games. With 6 opponents in the other division, that means there's a literal 50/50 chance that Alabama and Tennessee would play each other in any given season in your dynasty. To solve this, does it really make sense to put Tennessee in the same division as Alabama, when Tennessee has no other common rivalries with Alabama? In the current state of the sport, protected rivalries are used by conferences in the post-division format, to ensure that teams do not skip major rivalries when drawing opponents. The Big Ten and ACC protect several rivalries for each team as their conference memberships ballooned in the 2021-2024 realignment. As an example of what schools' schedules would look like without protected rivalries, lets look at the Big Ten. For Michigan, you would draw 9 teams (9 conference games) out of 17 possible (18 teams minus yourself), leaving you with only a 53% chance that Ohio State-Michigan would be played in any given year. The Big Ten was not going to lose Ohio State-Michigan just because of a scheduling glitch. However, this protection does not exist in the game. It may appear to be there the first few years as you cycle through the railroaded conference schedule (assuming you don't change the membership at all), but once those games are gone (either because you added a team or played too many seasons for the default schedule to run out), it reverts to the mere random draw. I mean god forbid you try to do something like add Notre Dame to the Big Ten, and yet if you do the entire thing breaks! And to be clear, this model of protected rivalries without divisions (though it should exist both with and without divisions) predates 2024. The FCS has used this model, with the Big Sky using it after Northern Colorado joined in 2006 and the conference got too big to do a round robin. The Big Ten used to use it from 1992 to 2011 when it had 11 teams. The 10-team SEC that existed 1966-1991 never played a 9-game round robin, and also used protected rivalries. Mere random draw on the schedule has never been a part of the sport, and protected rivalries as a scheduling concept predates divisions. Protected Rivalries gives conferences and players flexibility and control over the state of the sport. Divisions are not protected rivalries, and have never been considered as such by any stakeholder in the sport, and they were not presented this way by EA until they were deceptively presented this way this past year. I hope EA rectifies this and gives us a more customizable and accurate way to fix our dynasties and RtGs.Separate download for Ultimate Team
Having a choice to download the full game or the full game + Ultimate Team would be great. Sort of like the way Call of Duty has a few different download options. Accidently clicking into Ultimate Team when you start the game almost makes you want to just close and restart. Especially for someone who won't ever touch the game mode, it just takes up space. Nothing major, just a little annoyance I sometimes have when accidently clicking into CUT.RTG POSITION OPTIONS
I believe that ea sports was better when it gave the player the option. For the previous title it did not include any other positions such as OLB, SS,FS,TE,OL,DL,K,P. To make college football a more authentic experience the player should be able to experience that lens from every angle. We should be able to play all positions as we were able to with 2014 and previous titles(excluding TE,OL,K,P - madden 06 did all). Ea this is a minor but major detail to the game feature we the player would like to have back as an option.Created Rivalries
I don't Know if this is a Big ask or will even make it in the game, but, it would fun to make a rivalry. I think that this would Nice to put budding rivalry like Texas tech Vs Ok St in the game, or add completely new ones. It is very annoying to add a team builder on certain team just so you can have a rivalry against the team you wantCo-Op ownership of an online dynasty coach
Hear me out. Not sure how difficult this would be, but having the ability for 2 users to control the same coach in a dynasty would be a game changer for online dynasties advancement speed. How many times are dynasty advances, in a 20+ user dynasty, held up because 1 or 2 players cannot get their game in? This feature would allow for up to 2 users to be able to login and play the game. "I will be out of town this week, but Bob can play the games...no more holding up the dynasty!"suggestions
i have a lot of suggestions 1; have the create a prospect back in both in season and off season recruiting. 2 in team builder have a recruiting time to fill roster spots instead of being given a generic roster recruit for 4 weeks and sign players after 4 weeksfill the spots not signed. 3 bring spring drills from the ps2 versions back and drills to them like drills to add speed offensive line drills and kicking/punting drills. 4 bring the coaching tree back. 5 at the end of the season have the coach tell players what they focus on improving for the next season, 6 in recruiting have where your team stands when recruiting a layer top 10 25 50 etcPls add: formation substitution, pitch invasion, stadium pulse
Formation substitution is very important in the game of football. Whether if it’s on offense or defense, formation substitution is a great strategy for victory. In college you might have a freshman or sophomore athlete that may demand “playing time,” but you might have a junior or senior athlete as the starter at that position. With formation substitutions you can plug in that underclassmen in certain formations which can help satisfy their need for “playing time.” Also formation substitution can help reduce fatigue or “wear & tear” on the starters. I would like to see a longer sustain stadium pulse. In college football 25, it seems like once you get a two score lead on your opponent at home, the stadium pulse is reduced dramatically. I understand if the game is a blow out, then the crowd would naturally become less interested. But for rivalry games and top 25 matches, the stadium pulse should last most longer no matter the score differential. Maybe it might be asking for too much, but “Pitch invasion” or storming the field would be a great addition to college football 26. Whether if it’s an upset victory from a rival school or top 25 undefeated team, “Pitch invasion” would be an interesting addition to the game.
WR, Gameplay and Animation
As a community nothing pees in your corn flakes more than a WR, Jumping when he should of just ran under the ball. Also not being able to control your WR after click on. You should be able to control an speed burst just as the defense does when clicking into a DB. Please make Rac catches or catchers keep their momentum and cut up the field on in/out routes turn up the field on comeback/stop routes. Jump or aggressively attack the ball on Aggressive catches These Two things on Offenses would be a great quality of life change for the gameThe short beta length
The beta for EA College Football 26 really should have been longer. For a game that fans had a long list of request from, a short beta window just isn’t enough time to get a real feel for the gameplay, test different modes, or provide meaningful feedback. Players need more than a few days to explore mechanics, spot bugs, and help the developers fine-tune the experience before launch. A longer beta would not only give fans more hands-on time, but it would also lead to a more polished final product—something everyone wants after their request over the last game was made plus a longer beta can help players get more accustomed to the mechanics that were implementedReceived TWO invalid codes
So I received the beta code yesterday but didn't have time to play it. I try to redeem the code that was in the email in PS, and it said that the code was already used, couldn't even press download. I goto the website to enter in the already used code so I could get another one, no biggie right? Yep. They sent me another code that was already used AGAIN. I have email proof of this as well. How can I get an actual valid code, because it won't even give me another one. Thanks.Position battle/coach trust
NCAA 14 had a great system for gaining coaches trust and winning position battles were actually challenging I feel like the way you earn coaches trust in CFB25 it’s to easy and position battles are way WAY to easy to win I feel like EA should bring back the old position battles and fix the way you can gain the coaches trust.
